Thanks, Jan, for noticing the incorrect archive locations. I must have
missed a step when following my instructions
<https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/blob/master/admin/releasing.md>.
They should be in the 1.8.0 directory. It would have caused a problem with
the step

   - svn move -m "Release log4cxx 1.8.0"
   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4cxx/1.8.0
   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/log4cxx/



On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 5:52 AM Jan Friedrich <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> I needed to adjust
>
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/blob/master/admin/validate-release.sh#L27
> (locally)
>
> FULL_DL="$BASE_DL/$VERSION/$ARCHIVE"
>
> to
>
> FULL_DL="$BASE_DL/$ARCHIVE"
>
> because the files are directly in
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4cxx/
>
> and
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4cxx/1.8.0
>
> is empty.
>
> - signatures valid
> - checksums match
> - tests successful
>
> Jan
>
>
> On 7/24/26 02:35, Robert Middleton wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Signatures check OK, checksums OK.  All tests now pass.
> >
> > -Robert Middleton
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 9:48 PM Stephen Webb <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4cxx 1.8.0.
> >>
> >> Website:
> https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4cxx/changelog.html#rel_1_8_0
> >> GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx
> >> Commit: b63993f82346e0db103ef7d210d95478e729cfc0
> >> Distribution: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4cxx/
> >> Signing key: 077E8893A6DCC33DD4A4D5B256E73BA9A0B592D0
> >> Review kit:
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/blob/master/admin/release-review-instructions.md
> >>
> >> Please download, test, and cast your votes on this mailing list.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1, release the artifacts
> >> [ ] -1, don't release, because ...
> >>
> >> This vote is open for 72 hours and will pass unless it gets a net
> >> negative vote count.
> >> All votes are welcome, and we encourage everyone to test the release,
> >> but only the
> >> Logging Services PMC votes are officially counted.
>
>

Reply via email to