So do we want to just remove the 1x indexes from :z and 2x from trunk? Or do we also want to remove the live migration code? How can one start with that for example? Are there constants to look for for example?
Shai On Monday, May 24, 2010, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/24/10 11:25 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: > > Yes, I think we can remove support for 1.9 indexes as of 3.0: > > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BackwardsCompatibility > > So starting with 3.0 the oldest index we must support are those written by > 2.0. > > Mike > > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Shai Erera<ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > I'm working on adding support for addIndexes* in TestBackwardsCompatibility, > and I've noticed it still reads 1.9 indexes. Is that intentional? Shouldn't > 3x stop supporting 1.9? > > Shai > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > We really need to update that wiki page - mucho changes. > > -- > - Mark > > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
