[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870843#action_12870843
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2413:
-------------------------------------
{quote}
contrib/benchmark's NewShingleAnalyzerTask depends on modules'
o.a.l.analysis.shingle.ShingleAnalyzerWrapper - causing cyclic dependency
between projects - e.g. when creating separate Eclipse projects for lucene and
modules.
{quote}
Hi, its not a cyclic dependency, as the analyzers module only depends on core
lucene.
If you want to have separate projects I would make the contribs separate, too,
or put everything in one eclipse project (this is what I prefer).
> Consolidate all (Solr's & Lucene's) analyzers into modules/analysis
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2413
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2413
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: contrib/analyzers
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2413-charfilter.patch, LUCENE-2413-PFAW+LF.patch,
> LUCENE-2413_commongrams.patch, LUCENE-2413_folding.patch,
> LUCENE-2413_htmlstrip.patch, LUCENE-2413_icu.patch,
> LUCENE-2413_keep_hyphen_trim.patch, LUCENE-2413_keyword.patch,
> LUCENE-2413_mockfilter.patch, LUCENE-2413_mockfilter.patch,
> LUCENE-2413_pattern.patch, LUCENE-2413_porter.patch,
> LUCENE-2413_removeDups.patch, LUCENE-2413_synonym.patch,
> LUCENE-2413_teesink.patch, LUCENE-2413_test4.patch,
> LUCENE-2413_testanalyzer.patch, LUCENE-2413_testanalyzer.patch,
> LUCENE-2413_tests2.patch, LUCENE-2413_tests3.patch, LUCENE-2413_wdf.patch
>
>
> We've been wanting to do this for quite some time now... I think, now that
> Solr/Lucene are merged, and we're looking at opening an unstable line of
> development for Solr/Lucene, now is the right time to do it.
> A standalone module for all analyzers also empowers apps to separately
> version the analyzers from which version of Solr/Lucene they use, possibly
> enabling us to remove Version entirely from the analyzers.
> We should also do LUCENE-2309 (decouple, as much as possible, indexer from
> the analysis API), but I don't think that issue needs to block this
> consolidation.
> Once we do this, there is one place where our users can find all the
> analyzers that Solr/Lucene provide.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
