[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12878385#action_12878385
]
Peter Karich commented on SOLR-787:
-----------------------------------
Is this really correctly fixed? Inspecting my deps with NetBeans' maven dep
viewer I don't understand why Solr uses woodstox and SolrJ uses the different
artifact (but same jar) org.codehaus.woodstox
And according to
http://jarvana.com/jarvana/inspect-pom/org/apache/solr/solr-core/1.4.0/solr-core-1.4.0.pom
http://jarvana.com/jarvana/inspect-pom/org/apache/solr/solr-solrj/1.4.0/solr-solrj-1.4.0.pom
NetBeans is correct.
The problem with this is, that you will have two identical jars in the
classpath and that the solrj dep forces you to still use stax-api
> SolrJ POM refers to stax parser
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-787
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-787
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-787.patch
>
>
> Solr core moved to using woodstox instead of stax but SolrJ POM still has a
> dependency to stax. We should replace the dependency to stax with woodstox
> jar in SolrJ's POM.
> This is not a huge problem as we are not distributing stax anymore but is
> needed for consistency.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
