[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12878741#action_12878741
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-2454:
--------------------------------------
That's an interesting strategy. The size of these arrays is no big deal to me
since there's only a couple of them. My concern with this strategy is that I
wonder if potentially many places in Solr would have to be become aware of this
scheme which might make this strategy untenable to implement even though its
theoretically sound.
Another nice thing about the parallel index is that the idf relevancy factor
stays clean since it will only consider "real" documents.
I want to investigate these options closer ASAP since this feature you've
implemented is something I need. Before I saw this issue, I was going to try
something with SpanNearQuery and the masking-field variant.
> Nested Document query support
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2454
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2454
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 3.0.2
> Reporter: Mark Harwood
> Assignee: Mark Harwood
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LuceneNestedDocumentSupport-1.zip
>
>
> A facility for querying nested documents in a Lucene index as outlined in
> http://www.slideshare.net/MarkHarwood/proposal-for-nested-document-support-in-lucene
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
