[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12890517#action_12890517
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1240:
--------------------------------
Using the example data, here's an example of a monster query that uses
facet.date and facet.range on the same field with the same start/end/gap as
well as doing facet.range on the (float) price and (ing) popularity fields ...
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?wt=xml&indent=true&echoParams=none&q=*:*&rows=0&facet.range=price&f.price.facet.range.start=-2.3&f.price.facet.range.end=145.66&f.price.facet.range.gap=13.7432&facet.date=manufacturedate_dt&facet.date.start=NOW/YEAR-5YEARS&facet.date.end=NOW/YEAR%2B1DAY&facet.date.gap=%2B1YEAR&facet=true&facet.range.other=all&facet.range=manufacturedate_dt&f.manufacturedate_dt.facet.range.start=NOW/YEAR-5YEARS&f.manufacturedate_dt.facet.range.end=NOW/YEAR%2B1YEAR&f.manufacturedate_dt.facet.range.gap=%2B1YEAR&facet.range=popularity&facet.range.start=-2&facet.range.gap=3&facet.range.end=11
{code:xml}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<response>
<lst name="responseHeader">
<int name="status">0</int>
<int name="QTime">5</int>
</lst>
<result name="response" numFound="19" start="0"/>
<lst name="facet_counts">
<lst name="facet_queries"/>
<lst name="facet_fields"/>
<lst name="facet_dates">
<lst name="manufacturedate_dt">
<int name="2005-01-01T00:00:00Z">2</int>
<int name="2006-01-01T00:00:00Z">9</int>
<int name="2007-01-01T00:00:00Z">0</int>
<int name="2008-01-01T00:00:00Z">0</int>
<int name="2009-01-01T00:00:00Z">0</int>
<int name="2010-01-01T00:00:00Z">0</int>
<str name="gap">+1YEAR</str>
<date name="end">2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</date>
</lst>
</lst>
<lst name="facet_ranges">
<lst name="price">
<lst name="meta">
<float name="gap">13.7432</float>
<float name="end">148.87521</float>
<int name="before">0</int>
<int name="after">10</int>
<int name="between">7</int>
</lst>
<int name="-2.3">2</int>
<int name="11.4432">2</int>
<int name="25.186401">0</int>
<int name="38.929604">0</int>
<int name="52.672806">0</int>
<int name="66.41601">2</int>
<int name="80.15921">1</int>
<int name="93.90241">0</int>
<int name="107.645615">0</int>
<int name="121.38882">0</int>
<int name="135.13202">0</int>
</lst>
<lst name="manufacturedate_dt">
<lst name="meta">
<str name="gap">+1YEAR</str>
<date name="end">2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</date>
<int name="before">0</int>
<int name="after">0</int>
<int name="between">11</int>
</lst>
<int name="2005-01-01T00:00:00Z">2</int>
<int name="2006-01-01T00:00:00Z">9</int>
<int name="2007-01-01T00:00:00Z">0</int>
<int name="2008-01-01T00:00:00Z">0</int>
<int name="2009-01-01T00:00:00Z">0</int>
<int name="2010-01-01T00:00:00Z">0</int>
</lst>
<lst name="popularity">
<lst name="meta">
<int name="gap">3</int>
<int name="end">13</int>
<int name="before">0</int>
<int name="after">0</int>
<int name="between">18</int>
</lst>
<int name="-2">3</int>
<int name="1">2</int>
<int name="4">13</int>
<int name="7">7</int>
<int name="10">2</int>
</lst>
</lst>
</lst>
</response>
{code}
> Numerical Range faceting
> ------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1240
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1240
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: search
> Reporter: Gijs Kunze
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch,
> SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch
>
>
> For faceting numerical ranges using many facet.query query arguments leads to
> unmanageably large queries as the fields you facet over increase. Adding the
> same faceting parameter for numbers which already exists for dates should fix
> this.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
