[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893312#action_12893312
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1799:
--------------------------------------------

The char[] -> byte[] encode time is a miniscule part of indexing time.  And, in 
turn, indexing time is far less important than impact on search performance.  
So... let's focus on the search performance here.

Most queries are unaffected by the term encoding; it's only AutomatonQuery (= 
fuzzy, regexp, wildcard) that do a fair amount of decoding...

Net/net BOCU1 sounds like an awesome win over UTF8.

> Unicode compression
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1799
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Store
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.1
>            Reporter: DM Smith
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: Benchmark.java, LUCENE-1779.patch, LUCENE-1799.patch, 
> LUCENE-1799.patch, LUCENE-1799.patch, LUCENE-1799.patch, LUCENE-1799.patch, 
> LUCENE-1799.patch, LUCENE-1799.patch, LUCENE-1799.patch, LUCENE-1799.patch, 
> LUCENE-1799.patch, LUCENE-1799.patch, LUCENE-1799.patch, LUCENE-1799.patch, 
> LUCENE-1799.patch, LUCENE-1799_big.patch
>
>
> In lucene-1793, there is the off-topic suggestion to provide compression of 
> Unicode data. The motivation was a custom encoding in a Russian analyzer. The 
> original supposition was that it provided a more compact index.
> This led to the comment that a different or compressed encoding would be a 
> generally useful feature. 
> BOCU-1 was suggested as a possibility. This is a patented algorithm by IBM 
> with an implementation in ICU. If Lucene provide it's own implementation a 
> freely avIlable, royalty-free license would need to be obtained.
> SCSU is another Unicode compression algorithm that could be used. 
> An advantage of these methods is that they work on the whole of Unicode. If 
> that is not needed an encoding such as iso8859-1 (or whatever covers the 
> input) could be used.    

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to