Thanks, didn't think to look there.

Unfortunately I'm still getting back empty strings - and this is for a required 
field.  So something isn't right...

Maybe I'll pester Simon. ;-)
Karl

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Michael McCandless [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 12:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Question about string retrieval with FieldCache in trunk

Also note that the MIGRATE.txt in the lucene subdir should cover this.

Mike

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 18, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Jason Rutherglen <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Karl,
> 
> I believe one may pass an empty BytesRef in, and the values will be
> set within the getTerm method.
> 
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:18 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Exactly. getTerms() returns a DocTerms, which has this:
>> 
>>    /** The BytesRef argument must not be null; the method
>>     *  returns the same BytesRef, or an empty (length=0)
>>     *  BytesRef if the doc did not have this field or was
>>     *  deleted. */
>>    public abstract BytesRef getTerm(int docID, BytesRef ret);
>> 
>> How in the blazes do you create the correct BytesRef in the first place?  Or 
>> is the comment wrong?
>> 
>> Karl
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ext Yonik 
>> Seeley
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 10:55 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Question about string retrieval with FieldCache in trunk
>> 
>> Check out getTerms and getTermsIndex
>> 
>> -Yonik
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:49 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>> 
>>> What is the proper way to retrieve a string field from lucene in trunk?  I'm
>>> specifically looking for the equivalent of:
>>> 
>>> String[] fieldValues = FieldCache.DEFAULT.getStrings(reader,fieldName);
>>> String actualValue = fieldValues[luceneID-docBase];
>>> 
>>> The getStrings() method seems to have gone away in FieldCache.java, and it's
>>> not clear how to work with ByteRefs to do the equivalent.  Any hints?
>>> 
>>> Karl
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to