[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12908372#action_12908372
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2640:
-------------------------------------
bq. I would revert the changes and any previous randomization in the parts that
are respo nsible for the zip file creation.
Uwe, good catch. really though, the parts of the test that modify the index
once opened should be randomized.
only createIndex() should have no randomization... I'll fix this.
> add LuceneTestCase[J4].newField
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2640
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2640
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: Tests
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 3.1, 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2640.patch
>
>
> I think it would be good to vary the different field options in tests.
> For example, we do this with IW settings (newIndexWriterConfig), and
> directories (newDirectory).
> This patch adds newField(), it works just like new Field(), except it will
> sometimes turns on extra options:
> Stored fields, term vectors, additional term vectors data, etc.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
