And this is why unit tests shouldn't spew- just yes or no, please. If
you want to patch this, please comment out all the printed trash, since
all it does is cause mail threads like this.
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Grant Ingersoll<gsing...@apache.org> wrote:
contrib/extraction prints an 'unknown field a' exception
The printing of this could be commented out, possibly. The exception being
thrown is proper operation, as the field a does not exist.
Yeah, but the bigger question is if field "a" should have been
generated given the specific extraction configuration.
If it's explicitly testing for an exception, then we can ignore it
(add it to the ignores list)... otherwise it's either a test bug or a
solr-cell bug, right?
-Yonik
http://lucenerevolution.org Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
