On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 20, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: >> I am also re-asserting (as I have asserted in the past) that the Maven >> artifacts are *optional*. >> We've discussed maven not being mandatory before: >> http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/bd618c89a4d458dc/lucene_2_9_again >> http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/3b98fa9ec3073936 >> > > You asserting in previous threads that Maven is optional does not make it > optional.
I *think* that's a roundabout way of saying that you do think it's mandatory. But you've been unable to point to how it became mandatory... and there seems to be a distinct lack of consensus over it. Certainly makes it sound optional. -Yonik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
