[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921204#action_12921204
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2002:
--------------------------------
bq. The text format is so much easier to read, and it also streams correctly.
The XML impl buffers everything in memory,
and even leads to OOM errors if you try a long-running test.
Ah .. ok .. i remember this being discussed now. (we still have to be
conciencious about the OOM issue though since hudson requires the xml formatter)
If "plain" makes sense for Solr because of readability, streaming, and OOMs,
then shouldn't it be the default for the entire tree?
> improve build/tests
> -------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2002
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2002
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Build
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.1, 4.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-2002.junit.xml.formatter.patch, SOLR-2002.patch,
> SOLR-2002_buildfailed.patch, SOLR-2002_core_contrib.patch,
> SOLR-2002_dih.patch, SOLR-2002_lbhttpsolrserver.patch,
> SOLR-2002_localization.patch, SOLR-2002_lucenetestcase.patch,
> SOLR-2002_merged.patch, SOLR-2002_merged.patch, SOLR-2002_merged.patch,
> SOLR-2002_merged.patch, SOLR-2002_replication.patch,
> SOLR-2002_testiter.patch, SOLR-2002_testmethod.patch,
> SOLR-2002_timeout.patch, SOLR-2002setupteardown.patch
>
>
> we are working on improving some functionality in lucene's build/tests, it
> would be good to improve the solr side to take advantage of it.
> currently its only sorta-kinda integrated and a bit messy.
> i'd like to do some incremental improvements piece-by-piece on this issue.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
