[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12922723#action_12922723
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1240:
--------------------------------
bq. Normal field faceting uses a NamedList for the counts to favor preserving
order. Should this be consistent?
Hmmm.... I wrote it to be consistent with date faceting which has always used
SimpleOrderedMap ... not sure why.
I think you are right though, NamedList makes more sense (and range faceting's
output is already not output compatible with date faceting, so it's not a big
deal)
> Numerical Range faceting
> ------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1240
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1240
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: search
> Reporter: Gijs Kunze
> Assignee: Hoss Man
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.1, 4.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch,
> SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch,
> SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch
>
>
> For faceting numerical ranges using many facet.query query arguments leads to
> unmanageably large queries as the fields you facet over increase. Adding the
> same faceting parameter for numbers which already exists for dates should fix
> this.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
