On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Andi Vajda <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've used this in a URL index. I needed to be able to distinguish between > searching URLs that had, say, no path, from searching URLs without matching > the path component. The absence of path was represented with an empty token > in the path field. >
but you didn't really need to use the empty term... you could have used something like U+001F INFORMATION SEPARATOR... and your whole index would have been an entire byte bigger? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
