[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929377#action_12929377 ]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2167: ------------------------------------- bq. Would it somehow be possible to allow multiple Tokenizers to work together? The only thing I can think of right now is a new kind of component that feeds raw text (or post-char-filter text) to a configurable set of tokenizers/recognizers, then melds their results using some (hopefully configurable) strategy, like "longest-match-wins" or "create-overlapping-tokens", etc. This would slow things down, of course, since analysis has to be performed multiple times over the same chunk of input text... > Implement StandardTokenizer with the UAX#29 Standard > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2167 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: contrib/analyzers > Affects Versions: 3.1, 4.0 > Reporter: Shyamal Prasad > Assignee: Steven Rowe > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.1, 4.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-2167-jflex-tld-macro-gen.patch, > LUCENE-2167-jflex-tld-macro-gen.patch, LUCENE-2167-jflex-tld-macro-gen.patch, > LUCENE-2167-lucene-buildhelper-maven-plugin.patch, > LUCENE-2167.benchmark.patch, LUCENE-2167.benchmark.patch, > LUCENE-2167.benchmark.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, > LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, > LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, > LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, > LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, > LUCENE-2167.patch, standard.zip, StandardTokenizerImpl.jflex > > Original Estimate: 0.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0.5h > > It would be really nice for StandardTokenizer to adhere straight to the > standard as much as we can with jflex. Then its name would actually make > sense. > Such a transition would involve renaming the old StandardTokenizer to > EuropeanTokenizer, as its javadoc claims: > bq. This should be a good tokenizer for most European-language documents > The new StandardTokenizer could then say > bq. This should be a good tokenizer for most languages. > All the english/euro-centric stuff like the acronym/company/apostrophe stuff > can stay with that EuropeanTokenizer, and it could be used by the european > analyzers. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org