[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13868368#comment-13868368
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-5623:
----------------------------------------
Here's another ouch.
Doc for Document#get says:
{code}
/** Returns the string value of the field with the given name if any exist in
* this document, or null. If multiple fields exist with this name, this
* method returns the first value added. If only binary fields with this name
* exist, returns null.
* For {@link IntField}, {@link LongField}, {@link
* FloatField} and {@link DoubleField} it returns the string value of the
number. If you want
* the actual numeric field instance back, use {@link #getField}.
*/
{code}
But given a Solr field like the following, with a value of '1', I end up with
\u0080\u0000\u0001. It doesn't appear to be an IntField, just a Field. What am
I missing?
{code}
<field name="id" type="sint" indexed="true" stored="true"
multiValued="false"/>
{code}
> Better diagnosis of RuntimeExceptions in analysis
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-5623
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Benson Margulies
>
> If an analysis component (tokenizer, filter, etc) gets really into a hissy
> fit and throws a RuntimeException, the resulting log traffic is less than
> informative, lacking any pointer to the doc under discussion (in the doc
> case). It would be more better if there was a catch/try shortstop that logged
> this more informatively.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
