[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13894624#comment-13894624
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-5439:
-----------------------------------------
Fair enough. I'll probably put up a patch, but leave in the Clover stuff and
then we can compare side-by-side. I like that Jacoco doesn't require you to
pre-instrument your classes, but I admit I am not up on Clover's latest
capabilities to know whether it can or not.
I forget the Clover licensing terms. Can anyone use it or only committers? If
it is the latter, I think we should add Jacoco too, since then anyone can run
it. If it is the former, then we can either leave alone or use side-by-side.
> Switch the Lucene/Solr build to use Jacoco for Test Coverage
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5439
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5439
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
>
> Jacoco (http://www.jacoco.org/) is a much cleaner and simpler to use code
> coverage tool than clover and additionally doesn't require having a third
> party license since it is open source. It also has nice Jenkins integration
> tools that make it incredibly easy to see what is and isn't tested. We
> should convert the Lucene and Solr builds to use Jacoco instead of Clover.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
