[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13896996#comment-13896996
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5652:
-------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1566742 from [~steve_rowe] in branch 'dev/branches/branch_4x'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1566742 ]

SOLR-5652: in cursor tests, don't sort on 'plain' docvalue fields (i.e., those 
using standard Lucene sorting for missing values) when the codec doesn't 
support missing docvalues. (merged trunk r1566741)

> Heisenbug in DistribCursorPagingTest: "walk already seen ..."
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-5652
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5652
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Assignee: Hoss Man
>         Attachments: 129.log, 372.log, 
> SOLR-5652-dont-sort-on-any-dv-fields-when-codec-doesnt-support-missing-dvs.patch,
>  SOLR-5652.codec.skip.dv.patch, SOLR-5652.nocommit.patch, SOLR-5652.patch, 
> bin_dv.post-patch.log.txt, 
> jenkins.thetaphi.de_Lucene-Solr-4.x-MacOSX_1200.log.txt, 
> jenkins.thetaphi.de_Lucene-Solr-4.x-MacOSX_1217.log.txt, 
> str_dv.post-patch.log.txt
>
>
> Several times now, Uwe's jenkins has encountered a "walk already seen ..." 
> assertion failure from DistribCursorPagingTest that I've been unable to 
> fathom, let alone reproduce (although sarowe was able to trigger a similar, 
> non-reproducible seed, failure on his machine)
> Using this as a tracking issue to try and make sense of it.
> Summary of things noticed so far:
> * So far only seen on http://jenkins.thetaphi.de & sarowe's mac
> * So far seen on MacOSX and Linux
> * So far seen on branch 4x and trunk
> * So far seen on Java6, Java7, and Java8
> * fails occured in first block of randomized testing: 
> ** we've indexed a small number of randomized docs
> ** we're explicitly looping over every field and sorting in both directions
> * fails were sorting on one of the "\*_dv_last" or "\*_dv_first" fields 
> (docValues=true, either sortMissingLast=true OR sortMissingFirst=true) 
> ** for desc sorts, sort on same field asc has worked fine just before this 
> (fields are in arbitrary order, but "asc" always tried before "desc")
> ** sorting on some other random fields has sometimes been tried before this 
> and worked
> (specifics of each failure seen in the wild recorded in comments)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to