[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13897949#comment-13897949
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5440:
------------------------------------
bq. I don't think FixedBitSet should be external.
+1. I mistakenly removed the \@lucene.internal annotation, will add it back in
the new patch. Our API isn't FixedBitSet, it's Filter/DocIdSet. And we offer
DocIdBitSet (external) to use w/ Java's BitSet. It's not true that users cannot
write their own Filters - they can write them using DocIdBitSet, or risk and
use the internal FixedBitSet. I wouldn't want to see FBS stays w/ that name,
just because once there was OpenBitSet - renaming (just as removing 'extends
DocIdSet') is a trivial change to your code when you migrate...
> Add LongFixedBitSet and replace usage of OpenBitSet
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5440
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/search
> Reporter: Shai Erera
> Assignee: Shai Erera
> Attachments: LUCENE-5440-solr.patch, LUCENE-5440.patch,
> LUCENE-5440.patch, LUCENE-5440.patch, LUCENE-5440.patch, LUCENE-5440.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from here: http://lucene.markmail.org/thread/35gw3amo53dsqsqj. I
> wrote a LongFixedBitSet which behaves like FixedBitSet, only allows managing
> more than 2.1B bits. It overcome some issues I've encountered with
> OpenBitSet, such as the use of set/fastSet as well the implementation of
> DocIdSet. I'll post a patch shortly and describe it in more detail.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
