[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13904675#comment-13904675
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5452:
-------------------------------------
Cool, maybe we can actually optimize the existing PQ stuff anyway (its not
super-huper-duper optimized). But in general its bounded towards the number of
matching sentences per doc, which is presumably quite small (there is some
paper suggesting more than 5 is not that useful, so I assumed that). I'll take
a look.
The other thing that concerned me (and it may be just fine in your patch), is i
couldn't tell if there was a little O(n^2) as far as fields go (fieldsIn *
fieldsToMatchedFields), and the termsenum/docsenum/etc reuse across same
segment became even more hairier than it is now (and its definitely ugly now).
The final advantage of the "level above" would be, the multi-term highlighting
etc would work for free.
I'm gonna open a separate issue to try to improve some of this existing code,
it was confusing to me just looking at it.
> Combine matches from multiple fields into one with the postings highlighter
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5452
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5452
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/search
> Reporter: Nik Everett
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-5452.patch
>
>
> Like you can do with the FVH, it'd be nice to be able combine matches from
> multiple fields with the postings highlighter.
> Note that the postings highlighter doesn't do phrase matching and doesn't use
> term boosts so some of the FVH's field combining features won't work. It'd
> be nice to get some of them, though.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
