It was always this way. i don't think such kinds of normalization should be standards either (what this stuff is doing is heuristical in nature).
This is just provided as an option in case someone wants it, thats all. On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I may have missed the train on this, but what is the status of > ICUFoldingFilter? > > Documentation suggests it follows foldings specified in UTR#30 > (http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_6_1/analyzers-icu/org/apache/lucene/analysis/icu/ICUFoldingFilter.html), > but UTR#30 is a draft that was later withdrawn > (http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr30/). > > I'm not up-to-date with the greatest and latest in the Unicode world so I'm > not sure why it was withdrawn, but given the delicacy of term normalization > I suppose this worth revisiting? > > Thanks, > > -- > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > http://code972.com | @synhershko > Freelance Developer & Consultant > Author of RavenDB in Action > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
