[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5519:
------------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-5519.patch
next iteration... I added a new class TopResults that encodes the info if it's
complete or not and added asssertions where appropriate.
> Make queueDepth enforcing optional in TopNSearcher
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5519
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5519
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/FSTs
> Affects Versions: 4.7
> Reporter: Simon Willnauer
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.8, 5.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-5519.patch, LUCENE-5519.patch
>
>
> currently TopNSearcher enforces the maxQueueSize based on rejectedCount +
> topN. I have a usecase where I just simply don't know the exact limit and I
> am ok with a top N that is not 100% exact. Yet, if I don't specify the right
> upper limit for the queue size I get an assertion error when I run tests but
> the only workaround it to make the queue unbounded which looks odd while it
> would possibly work just fine. I think it's fair to add an option that just
> doesn't enforce the limit and if it shoudl be enforced we throw a real
> exception.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
