[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13937326#comment-13937326
 ] 

Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-5488:
--------------------------------------

bq: I would highly discourage you from changing the patterns in the 
fieldFacets.txt. I had trouble keeping all of that stuff straight while writing 
it and I don't think that is where the issue is.

That's what I was worried about, although it seemed like interesting 
information that may shed light on what the _real_ issue is.

I disagree with the statement that these tests worked before. The whole point 
of the changes that have been made was because the tests _never_ worked 
consistently across all the test machine environments, which is why they were 
never merged into 4x. There would be random failures that have been going on 
for over three months. There haven't been any recently reported because the 
tests are ignored (see @BadApple in ExpressionTest and @Ignore in 
FieldFacetTest).

Ah well, I've got to go out now and won't get back to this for a bit.



> Fix up test failures for Analytics Component
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-5488
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5488
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.7, 5.0
>            Reporter: Erick Erickson
>            Assignee: Erick Erickson
>         Attachments: SOLR-5488.patch, SOLR-5488.patch, SOLR-5488.patch, 
> SOLR-5488.patch, SOLR-5488.patch, SOLR-5488.patch, SOLR-5488.patch, eoe.errors
>
>
> The analytics component has a few test failures, perhaps 
> environment-dependent. This is just to collect the test fixes in one place 
> for convenience when we merge back into 4.x



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to