[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13943105#comment-13943105
 ] 

Brett Hoerner commented on SOLR-5890:
-------------------------------------

Couldn't (shouldn't) there be an equivalent to setting __route__ but for 
deletes, though? I'm happy to tell it where to go, and I'd like to avoid having 
to leave my handy CloudSolrServer and go to handling my own clients and sending 
every delete directly to specific servers. Or is there already a way to do 
these deletes using my single CloudSolrServer instance?

> Delete silently fails if not sent to shard where document was added
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-5890
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5890
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SolrCloud
>    Affects Versions: 4.7
>         Environment: Debian 7.4.
>            Reporter: Peter Inglesby
>             Fix For: 4.8, 5.0, 4.7.1
>
>
> We have SolrCloud set up with two shards, each with a leader and a replica.  
> We use haproxy to distribute requests between the four nodes.
> Regardless of which node we send an add request to, following a commit, the 
> newly-added document is returned in a search, as expected.
> However, we can only delete a document if the delete request is sent to a 
> node in the shard where the document was added.  If we send the delete 
> request to a node in the other shard (and then send a commit) the document is 
> not deleted.  Such a delete request will get a 200 response, with the 
> following body:
>   {'responseHeader'=>{'status'=>0,'QTime'=>7}}
> Apart from the the very low QTime, this is indistinguishable from a 
> successful delete.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to