[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13993518#comment-13993518
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5659:
--------------------------------------------
The problem I hit was a StackOverflowError when testing AnalyzingSuggester on a
"big" suggestion.
But, it's just because that suggester calls .isFinite from an assert; I can
just remove the assert instead.
Also, for some reason, the test only seems to fail on Java 8; I'm not sure if
that version allocates less stack by default, or maybe just something about
this test env (maybe it passes a too-small -Xss or something).
We also call isFinite in CompiledAutomaton, whenever we run any AutomatonQuery
(e.g. FuzzyQuery, RegexpQuery, etc.), but likely those automata are tiny and
wouldn't overflow stack.
So net/net I'm OK with not doing this and just removing AnalyzingSuggester's
assert instead.
> SpecialOperations.isFinite hits StackOverflowError on automaton accepting
> long strings
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5659
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5659
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 4.9, 5.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-5659.patch
>
>
> Just like we fixed getFiniteStrings to not consume stack in proportion to the
> longest string accepted by the automaton (LUCENE-5628), isFinite has the same
> limitation. The fix is pretty simple; I just share the code from
> getFiniteStrings, but allocate two BitSets up front like the current impl.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
