Hi Alexandre; Actually I do not want to skip them. I just want to drop commitWithin parameter. It seems that I have to customize Solr for it. I think that it would be nice if commitWithin had been only query parameter instead of sending such kind of information within data too.
Thanks; Furkan KAMACI 2014-05-22 17:02 GMT+03:00 Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>: > Can you have a custom UpdateRequestProcessor in the chain that just > skips processing such requests? > > Regards, > Alex. > Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ > Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr > proficiency > > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi; > > > > As you know that commitWithin is a nice feature for Solr. You can either > use > > it via URL as a query parameter or within documents to index. As like: > > > > {"add":{ > > "doc":{"id":"change.me","title":"change.me > "},"boost":1.0,"overwrite":true,"commitWithin":1000}} > > > > However I think that is is not a feature of data and it should not be > > permitted within data to index. > > > > I have a use case for it: I have designed an infrastructure that drops > url > > parameters that is not related to data (as like commit or commitWithin). > > However as Solr supports a non-data related feature within data as a meta > > data I could not drop it and I have to analyze all data or customize > Solr. > > > > What do you think about that? Does it a good design to allow something > like > > that within data as meta data? > > > > Thanks; > > Furkan KAMACI > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
