[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Varun Thacker updated LUCENE-5688:
----------------------------------

    Attachment: LUCENE-5688.patch

I created a new DocValue format - SparseDocValuesFormat

I have just added Numeric support till now. Adding other should not take too 
long. Wanted to get some feedback on whether I'm on the right track.

It does a binary search on the position data which is read using 
MonotonicBlockPackedReader.

Also I am not too familiar with lucene-util but is there a test which 
benchmarks DocValue read times? Should be interesting to see the read time 
difference.

> NumericDocValues fields with sparse data can be compressed better 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-5688
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5688
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Varun Thacker
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-5688.patch, LUCENE-5688.patch
>
>
> I ran into this problem where I had a dynamic field in Solr and indexed data 
> into lots of fields. For each field only a few documents had actual values 
> and the remaining documents the default value ( 0 ) got indexed. Now when I 
> merge segments, the index size jumps up.
> For example I have 10 segments - Each with 1 DV field. When I merge segments 
> into 1 that segment will contain all 10 DV fields with lots if 0s. 
> This was the motivation behind trying to come up with a compression for a use 
> case like this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to