On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Well i have trouble with a few of your examples: "want to use >> Tee/Sink" doesn't work for me... its a description of an XY problem to >> me... i've never needed to use it, and its rarely discussed on the >> user list... > > Shrugs. In my experiments, it can really speed things up when analyzing the > same content, but with different outcomes, or at least it did back before the > new API. <snip> > For instance, the typical copy field scenario where one has two fields > containing the same content analyzed in slightly different ways. In many > cases, most of the work is exactly the same (tokenize, lowercase, stopword, > stem or not) and yet we have to pass around the string twice and do almost > all of the same work twice all so that we can change one little thing on the > token. > but didnt you just answer your own question? sounds like you just need to implement copyField in solr with Tee/Sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
