[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14040497#comment-14040497
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5775:
---------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1604707 from [~thetaphi] in branch 'dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_9'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1604707 ]

Revert:
Merged revision(s) 1604122 from lucene/dev/trunk:
SOLR-6178, LUCENE-5775: Deprecate JaspellLookupFactory

> JaspellTernarySearchTrie.ramBytesUsed hits StackOverflowError
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-5775
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5775
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.9, 5.0
>
>
> I hit this when trying to run LookupBenchmarkTest for LUCENE-5752:
> {noformat}
>    [junit4]   2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test  
> -Dtestcase=LookupBenchmarkTest -Dtests.method=testStorageNeeds 
> -Dtests.seed=EA0FADB2EE37D385 -Dtests.locale=es_ES 
> -Dtests.timezone=Etc/Greenwich -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8
>    [junit4] ERROR   1.89s | LookupBenchmarkTest.testStorageNeeds <<<
>    [junit4]    > Throwable #1: java.lang.StackOverflowError
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([EA0FADB2EE37D385:DF8106BCB29C472F]:0)
>    [junit4]    >      at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:2774)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> java.lang.Class.isCheckMemberAccessOverridden(Class.java:2214)
>    [junit4]    >      at java.lang.Class.checkMemberAccess(Class.java:2233)
>    [junit4]    >      at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredFields(Class.java:1805)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> org.apache.lucene.util.RamUsageEstimator.shallowSizeOfInstance(RamUsageEstimator.java:351)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> org.apache.lucene.util.RamUsageEstimator.shallowSizeOf(RamUsageEstimator.java:329)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.jaspell.JaspellTernarySearchTrie$TSTNode.ramBytesUsed(JaspellTernarySearchTrie.java:100)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.jaspell.JaspellTernarySearchTrie$TSTNode.ramBytesUsed(JaspellTernarySearchTrie.java:103)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.jaspell.JaspellTernarySearchTrie$TSTNode.ramBytesUsed(JaspellTernarySearchTrie.java:103)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.jaspell.JaspellTernarySearchTrie$TSTNode.ramBytesUsed(JaspellTernarySearchTrie.java:103)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.jaspell.JaspellTernarySearchTrie$TSTNode.ramBytesUsed(JaspellTernarySearchTrie.java:103)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.jaspell.JaspellTernarySearchTrie$TSTNode.ramBytesUsed(JaspellTernarySearchTrie.java:103)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.jaspell.JaspellTernarySearchTrie$TSTNode.ramBytesUsed(JaspellTernarySearchTrie.java:103)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.jaspell.JaspellTernarySearchTrie$TSTNode.ramBytesUsed(JaspellTernarySearchTrie.java:103)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.jaspell.JaspellTernarySearchTrie$TSTNode.ramBytesUsed(JaspellTernarySearchTrie.java:103)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.jaspell.JaspellTernarySearchTrie$TSTNode.ramBytesUsed(JaspellTernarySearchTrie.java:103)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.jaspell.JaspellTernarySearchTrie$TSTNode.ramBytesUsed(JaspellTernarySearchTrie.java:103)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.jaspell.JaspellTernarySearchTrie$TSTNode.ramBytesUsed(JaspellTernarySearchTrie.java:103)
>    [junit4]    >      at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.jaspell.JaspellTernarySearchTrie$TSTNode.ramBytesUsed(JaspellTernarySearchTrie.java:103)
> {noformat}
> I think we should just remove/deprecate this suggester?  The FST based 
> suggesters are far more RAM efficient...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to