[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12967148#action_12967148
]
Nick Pellow commented on LUCENE-2235:
-------------------------------------
Thanks for the clarification, Uwe. I wasn't sure if null Analyzers were meant
to be accepted or not. I was upgrading some existing code from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3
and stumbled across that, so its good to know.
I've created LUCENE-2801 to track the real reason the check should be done too!
> implement PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper.getOffsetGap
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2235
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2235
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Analysis
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Environment: Any
> Reporter: Javier Godoy
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.9.4, 3.0.3, 3.1, 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2235.patch, PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper.patch
>
>
> PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper does not delegates calls to getOffsetGap(Fieldable),
> instead it returns the default values from the implementation of Analyzer.
> (Similar to LUCENE-659 "PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper fails to implement
> getPositionIncrementGap")
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
