[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14067996#comment-14067996 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-6121: ------------------------------------ bq. If folks think a magic default is a better i've got no serious objections +1, I don't think there's much to gain from forcing a user to specify a tiebreaker. We don't force them to do it for non cursorMark sorts. > cursorMark should accept sort without the uniqueKey > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-6121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6121 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: David Smiley > Priority: Minor > > If you are using the cursorMark (deep paging) feature, you shouldn't *have* > to add the uniqueKey to the sort parameter. If the user doesn't do it, the > user obviously doesn't care about the uniqueKey order relative to whatever > other sort parameters they may or may not have provided. So if sort doesn't > have it, then Solr should simply tack it on at the end instead of providing > an error and potentially confusing the user. This would be more user > friendly. > Quoting Hoss from > [SOLR-5463|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5463?focusedCommentId=14011384&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14011384]: > {quote} > The reason the code currently throws an error was because i figured it was > better to force the user to choose which tie breaker they wanted (asc vs > desc) then to just magically pick one arbitrarily. > If folks think a magic default is a better i've got no serious objections – > just open a new issue. > {quote} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org