[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14072006#comment-14072006
]
James Dyer commented on SOLR-5111:
----------------------------------
It makes sense to me that we should do this. The only caution is you could
break someone's config in the case they were depending on WhitespaceAnalyzer.
I can't imagine this is what anyone would want, but you can never underestimate
Users.
> Change SpellCheckComponent default analyzer when queryAnalyzerFieldType is
> not defined
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-5111
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5111
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Varun Thacker
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.9, 5.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-5111.patch
>
>
> In the collection1 example, the SpellCheckComponent uses the query analyzer
> of "text_general" FieldType. If "queryAnalyzerFieldType" is removed from the
> configuration a WhitespaceAnalyzer is used by default.
> I suggest we could change the default to SimpleAnalyzer so that "foo" and
> "Foo" gives the same results and log that the analyzer is missing.
> Also are there more places in solrconfig which have dependencies on schema
> like this?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
