Hello,

Regarding stability: we use it in a number of high demand production web sites. 
So far (6month+) it seems stable as we did not run into any issues, crashes 
whatsoever - even though we use the experimental near realtime functionality 
first appeared in 2.9.x.

Also - performance in some use-cases (which are cardinal for us, like date and 
integer range queries) has been even further optimized in 2.9 to a level that 
is required  in high demand environments. Just as a quick example: we 
experimented with and index of 1million docs (each with 50+ fields) and queries 
that contained multiple range-queries for integers and dates and overall had 
20+ expressions in it. Executing it produced the first hit in 0.005 sec even 
under high load.

I am uncertain however about the future, most importantly bugfixes will ever be 
done to this release is just a big questionmark. As am I totally content with 
the current level of functionality (even on the log run) + heavily rely on the 
Java based docs and examples I wont be willing to replace Lucene.Net with 
something that is less compatible code/docs wise with the original java Lucene.

hth
Peter


-----Original Message-----
From: Remacle, Yannik [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 2:09 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: a question regarding lucene.net 2.9.2 stability

Hello,

Back in May, we used Lucene.Net 2.9.2 to test the feasibility of a some 
internal project. We were already using Lucene in Java in other projects, but 
wanted to try the C# port for integration reasons. It performed very well on a 
repository of about 8 millions documents; we didn’t encounter any serious 
issues. The project went dormant , so we didn’t use it in our production 
environment, and we didn’t test it extensively, but it did seem to be _very_ 
stable and fast. 

Now, a few months later, when we were about to revive our project, I’m reading 
all those threads regarding the future of Lucene.net, which seems, apparently, 
uncertain.

So, I was wondering, would you guys consider it a wise decision (or not) to use 
lucene.net 2.9.2? That is, hoping that 1) Lucene.Net 2.9.2 is stable enough, 
and 2) Lucene.Net has a future?

Thanks,
Yannik

Reply via email to