But that also implies that your search app holds a reference to the closed
IndexReader ...

Shai


On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Phil Herold <pher...@nc.rr.com> wrote:

> If the IndexReader is still holding a reference to the listener in its
> collection, I don't see how it could be GC'ed. This is a pretty classic
> memory leak case.
>
> --
> Phil
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>
>> Yeah,
>>
>>
>>
>> I dont see the memory leak, too. After you closed the IndexReader its
>> free for garbage collection. So it should no longer block the listener to
>> be GCed.
>>
>>
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>>
>> Uwe Schindler
>>
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>
>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 20, 2014 5:10 PM
>> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
>> *Subject:* Re: IndexReader.removeReaderClosedListener
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't understand something -- you add a ReaderClosedListener to get a
>> notification when IR.close() is called (actually, when it's actually being
>> closed). Why removing the listener after the reader has been closed? Don't
>> apps usually nullify their IR member after it's been closed?
>>
>> Shai
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Phil Herold <pher...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> Fine. I'm sure you've got a good reason for this. But it is totally
>> un-intuitive, and introduces a potential memory leak, IMO. The
>> implementation of this pattern is definitely different than just about any
>> other library I can think of.
>>
>>
>>
>> Given that having a listener for index closed doesn't really solve the
>> issue I was having that I was hoping it would, it doesn't much matter to me
>> at this point.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Phil
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I don't agree. Operations like this shouldnt be performed on closed
>> readers.
>>
>> the ensureOpen is correct.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Phil Herold <pher...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>> > Bingo. ensureOpen() should not be called from this method. Thanks.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Phil
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> In my opinion, removing the listener before close looks wrong. Because
>> you
>> >> would not get the listener events for the explicit close of the
>> >> DirectoryReader.
>> >>
>> >> I would just remove the ensureOpen(). We should open issue.
>> >>
>> >> Uwe
>> >> -----
>> >> Uwe Schindler
>> >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> >> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
>> >> > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 9:53 AM
>> >> > To: Lucene/Solr dev; Phil Herold
>> >> > Subject: Re: IndexReader.removeReaderClosedListener
>> >> >
>> >> > Hmm, you should call this method before closing the IndexReader, to
>> >> > remove a listener you previously added.
>> >> >
>> >> > Mike McCandless
>> >> >
>> >> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Phil Herold <herold.p...@gmail.com
>> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > > The implementation of this final method (latest 4.9 code) calls
>> >> > > ensureOpen(), which fails, since the reader is closed. As a result,
>> >> > > this method doesn't work. It seems as if this is therefore a
>> potential
>> >> > > memory leak,  not being able to remove the listener. Or am I
>> missing
>> >> > something?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > --
>> >> > > Phil
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For
>> additional
>> >> > commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to