[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14107220#comment-14107220 ]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-5889: ---------------------------------- bq. Is there a thread safety issue with the writer in AnalyzingInfixSuggester here? there's definitely a lock not getting freed somewhere - but i don't know about thread safety. bq. I am currently investigating the problem, will update when I find anything interesting. Thanks areek. NOTE: it's totally possible that this change itself is fine and correct, and just happened to tickle some existing bug in the Solr factories that wrap the suggesters > AnalyzingInfixSuggester should expose commit() > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-5889 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5889 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: modules/spellchecker > Reporter: Mike Sokolov > Fix For: 5.0, 4.11 > > Attachments: LUCENE-5889.patch, LUCENE-5889.patch > > > There is no way short of close() for a user of AnalyzingInfixSuggester to > cause it to commit() its underlying index: only refresh() is provided. But > callers might want to ensure the index is flushed to disk without closing. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org