Hi Simon,

I think it is because its a deprecated Tokenizer and the tests are only using 
the newer one?

Uwe

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 10:39 AM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.10.0 RC0
> 
> we found it upgrading ES and ryan and myself did ask ourself the same
> question why is there no test in Lucene that catches this :/
> 
> simon
> 
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de>
> wrote:
> > Why was this not detected by a test?
> >
> >
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> >
> > Uwe Schindler
> >
> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> >
> > http://www.thetaphi.de
> >
> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Ryan Ernst [mailto:r...@iernst.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 9:57 AM
> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.10.0 RC0
> >
> >
> >
> > Unfortunately I just found Lucene43NGramTokenizer was broken by my
> > Version cleanup from analysis constructors. It must be final. I'll fix
> > this and add a test in the morning. Hopefully will have a new RC by
> tomorrow evening.
> >
> > On Friday, August 22, 2014, Ryan Ernst <r...@iernst.net> wrote:
> >
> > Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 4.10.0.
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~rjernst/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.10.0-RC0-
> > rev1619858
> >
> > Or you can run the smoker tester directly with this command line
> > (assuming you have JAVA7_HOME set):
> > python3.2 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> > http://people.apache.org/~rjernst/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.10.0-RC0-
> > rev1619858
> > 1619858 4.10.0 /tmp/smoke_test_4_10
> >
> > Please note, the RC number is starting at 0 because I used the sample
> > command line in buildAndPushRelease.py.  If there is another release,
> > I will jump to RC2 to avoid confusion (thus it would be the "second"
> > RC).  I also plan to open an issue to clean up some things about
> > buildAndPushRelease.py help (or lack there of).
> >
> >> SUCCESS! [0:35:20.208893]
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ryan
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to