[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130493#comment-14130493
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5940:
--------------------------------------------

+1 to relax the policy

+1 for the ".99" approach: I think it's easier to "grok" than the time-based 
approach.

But if we do relax the policy I think we should also improve IndexUpgrader (or 
make a new top-level tool, which is what we expose to users, hiding the current 
IndexUpgrader, i.e. [~rjernst]'s idea) to do this upgrade across any 4.x to any 
5.x (or across more than 1 major release).

> change index backwards compatibility policy.
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-5940
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>
> Currently, our index backwards compatibility is unmanageable. The length of 
> time in which we must support old indexes is simply too long.
> The index back compat works like this: everyone wants it, but there are 
> frequently bugs, and when push comes to shove, its not a very sexy thing to 
> work on/fix, so its hard to get any help.
> Currently our back compat "promise" is just a broken promise, because we 
> cannot actually guarantee it for these reasons.
> I propose we scale back the length of time for which we must support old 
> indexes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to