On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:45 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com < david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ryan, > I’m unclear on what makes a “procedural vote” as such. This seems to me > to be about code modifications — in a big way as it’s a large change to the > codebase. > David, one way out of this is that a commit is a commit. A sufficiently unhappy PMC member can veto the commit, and thus force more discussion. If no PMC members are sufficiently unhappy, it stands. > > ~ David >
