That proposal was on a VOTE thread for a separate issue: moving trunk to Java8, and literally nobody replied to it.
Spreading this kind of decision around on several issues and threads and then assuming that everybody will put them together, understand which version of the proposal is active at any given second, and then somehow agree, is ridiculous. Steve On Sep 18, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > FYI, we are following this proposal: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAOdYfZUpAbYp-omdw=ngjsdzbkvhn2zydobzvj1gdxk+lrt...@mail.gmail.com%3E > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] >> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 7:38 PM >> To: 'dev@lucene.apache.org' >> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] The next Lucene/Solr release, aka 5.0 is the new 4.11 >> >> Hi Steve, >> >> Robert is currently backporting the "non-critical" stuff from Lucene 5. >> There is >> some code in 5.0, which is not ready to commit (like Lucene Stored >> Document's API). The approach above was just done like that for ease of >> handling. In fact, Robert created a "big patch" between trunk an branch_5x >> and removed all stuff that’s not ready for release. This would then be >> committed to 5.x branch for release. >> >> So the current workflow may be "untypical" but at the end was easier to >> handle than "reverting" changes in trunk that are not ready to release. >> >> We are not going to release the state of the branching today, it was just a >> step inbetween. After Robert's hard work we will have a large number of >> changes in 5.0, especially those breaking backwards compatibility (like the >> final move to Java 7 NIO.2). We are just inbetween at the moment. Stuff >> that’s unfinished (like we removed WAR file in trunk, but in contrast have no >> real Lucene Server with main() method, servlet free is not releaseable) were >> left out. >> >> Uwe >> >> ----- >> Uwe Schindler >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sar...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 7:26 PM >>> To: lucene dev >>> Subject: [DISCUSS] The next Lucene/Solr release, aka 5.0 is the new >>> 4.11 >>> >>> On LUCENE-5944, Robert and Uwe discussed moving trunk to 6.x and >>> “creating branch_5x”, which I understood to mean: >>> >>> svn copy trunk branch_6x >>> svn move trunk branch_5x >>> >>> Today, Robert did: >>> >>> svn copy branch_4x branch_5x >>> >>> and then Uwe did: >>> >>> svn remove branch_4x >>> >>> I don’t think this is the way to go. There is huge amount of >>> deprecation removal that happened on trunk, which will have to be >>> repeated on branch_5x prior to a release. >>> >>> How about we go with releasing what was trunk before today as 5.0? >>> That will have the same backcompat result as Robert/Uwe’s approach. >>> >>> Steve >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For >>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
