[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14151639#comment-14151639
 ] 

Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-5977:
--------------------------------------

+1

> IW should safeguard against token streams returning invalid offsets for 
> multi-valued fields
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-5977
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5977
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.9, 4.9.1, 4.10, 4.10.1
>            Reporter: Dawid Weiss
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.10.2
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-5977.patch
>
>
> We have a custom token stream that emits information about offsets of each 
> token. My (wrong) assumption was that for multi-valued fields a token 
> stream's offset information is magically shifted, much like this is the case 
> with positions. It's not the case -- offsets should be increasing and 
> monotonic across all instances of a field, even if it has custom token 
> streams. So, something like this:
> {code}
>         doc.add(new Field("field-foo", new CannedTokenStream(token("bar", 1, 
> 150, 160)), ftype));
>         doc.add(new Field("field-foo", new CannedTokenStream(token("bar", 1,  
> 50,  60)), ftype));
> {code}
> where the token function is defined as:
> {code}
> token(String image, int positionIncrement, int startOffset, int endOffset)
> {code}
> will result in either a cryptic assertion thrown from IW:
> {code}
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.AssertionError
>       at 
> org.apache.lucene.index.FreqProxTermsWriterPerField.writeOffsets(FreqProxTermsWriterPerField.java:99)
> {code}
> or nothing (or a codec error) if run without assertions.
> Obviously returning non-shifted offsets from subsequent token streams makes 
> little sense but I wonder if it could be made more explicit (or asserted) 
> that offsets need to be increasing between multiple-values. The minimum is to 
> add some documentation to OffsetAttribute. I don't know if offsets should be 
> shifted automatically, as it's the case with positions -- this would change 
> the semantics of existing tokenizers and filters which implement such 
> shifting internally already.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to