[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14155466#comment-14155466 ]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-5979: -------------------------------------- bq. I just am worried about 'crappy' implementations though, like FixedBitSet. Must that one really implement DocIDSet? LUCENE-5938 makes sure to not use FixedBitSet when the doc ids to store are sparse. I think the only last bad guys are ChainedFilter (which I proposed to remove) and BooleanFilter (that could be fixed). So I don't think this should be a blocker for this issue? > Use the cost API instead of a heuristic on the first document in > FilteredQuery to decide on whether to use random access > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-5979 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5979 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Adrien Grand > Assignee: Adrien Grand > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 5.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-5979.patch > > > Now that some major filters such as TermsFilter and > MultiTermQueryWrapperFilter return DocIdSets that have a better cost, we > should switch to the cost API. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org