[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14193962#comment-14193962 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6041: --------------------------------------------------------- Commit 1636166 from [~mikemccand] in branch 'dev/trunk' [ https://svn.apache.org/r1636166 ] LUCENE-6041: remove FieldInfo.isIndex/hasDocValues sugar APIs > remove sugar FieldInfo.isIndexed and .hasDocValues > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-6041 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6041 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Michael McCandless > Assignee: Michael McCandless > Fix For: 5.0, Trunk > > Attachments: LUCENE-6041.patch > > > Follow-on from LUCENE-6039; these two booleans don't really exist: they are > just sugar to check for IndexOptions.NO and DocValuesType.NO. I think for > the low-level schema API in Lucene we should not expose such sugar: callers > should have to be explicit. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org