[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14194635#comment-14194635
 ] 

Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-6517:
--------------------------------------

Well, it's worked in every test, both manual and automated that I've run so 
far. Do you have a failure that demonstrates this?

Maybe a mismatch in expectations? REBALANCELEADERS does _not_, and was not 
designed to, force the rebalancing immediately for nodes that do not have the 
preferredLeader property already set. It simply makes leaders out of those 
nodes that _already_ have the preferredLeader property set and are not 
currently the leader.

So to rebalance the leaders across the cluster, you first need to 
BALANCESHARDUNIQUE with the preferredLeader property and _then_ issue the 
REBALANCELEADERS command. That way it's not required that the entire cluster be 
balanced, you can selectively assign _some_ preferredLeaders if you want.

Or am I missing the boat completely? How do you see it "not working"?

> CollectionsAPI call REBALANCELEADERS
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-6517
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6517
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 5.0, Trunk
>            Reporter: Erick Erickson
>            Assignee: Erick Erickson
>             Fix For: 5.0, Trunk
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-6517.patch, SOLR-6517.patch, SOLR-6517.patch
>
>
> Perhaps the final piece of SOLR-6491. Once the preferred leadership roles are 
> assigned, there has to be a command "make it so Mr. Solr". This is something 
> of a placeholder to collect ideas. One wouldn't want to flood the system with 
> hundreds of re-assignments at once. Should this be synchronous or asnych? 
> Should it make the best attempt but not worry about perfection? Should it???
> a collection=name parameter would be required and it would re-elect all the 
> leaders that were on the 'wrong' node
> I'm thinking an optionally allowing one to specify a shard in the case where 
> you wanted to make a very specific change. Note that there's no need to 
> specify a particular replica, since there should be only a single 
> preferredLeader per slice.
> This command would do nothing to any slice that did not have a replica with a 
> preferredLeader role. Likewise it would do nothing if the slice in question 
> already had the leader role assigned to the node with the preferredLeader 
> role.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to