On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 14:42 +0100, Per Steffensen wrote: > Doc-values is a valid approach for us, but currently our id-field is > unfortunately not doc-value - at it is not easy for us to just > re-index all documents with id as doc-value.
At Lucene/Solr Revolution 2014 I presented that exact problem at Stump the Chump. After stalling for a minute with obligatory derogatory comments on our project design and a just at obligatory car analogy, he pointed me in the direction of a filtered index reader and asked me to code it and make it Open Source. Thomas Egense and I plan to take a crack at it one of these days. If the field is stored, it should be possible to make it DocValued by optimizing the index with a custom reader. > Besides that, our solution is diagonal on a field-cache/doc-values > solution in the way that one does not prevent the other, and if you do > one of them you will still be able to benefit from doing the other > one. I noticed that. Multiplying solutions are awesome. - Toke Eskildsen, State and University Library, Denmark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
