[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14216313#comment-14216313
 ] 

Per Steffensen commented on SOLR-6625:
--------------------------------------

bq.  One thing I wanted to avoid with this patch is putting authentication-type 
specific details in HttpSolrServer. SOLR-4470 has a little logic there that is 
basic-auth specific

Actually SOLR-4470 aims at introducing a framework for any authentication-type, 
and then (for now) implement basic-auth using this framework. It is prepared 
for adding new authentication types. See {{AuthCredentials}} carrying any kind 
of {{AbstractAuthMethod}} - currently only 
{{AbstractAuthMethod}}-implementation is {{BasicHttpAuth}}. Adding a new 
authentication type should basically be about adding a new 
{{AbstractAuthMethod}}-implementation. But sorry, I do not remember to many 
details. But what I do know, is that we have been using SOLR-4470 solution now 
in production for a long time, without any problems at all.

bq. As for the suggestion of using a BufferedHttpEntity rather than the OPTIONS 
approach I describe above, that certainly may be an improvement.

I do not know if it is an improvement compared to your approach. I just 
implemented in a way that worked. Supporting non-preemptive authenticating 
POST-requests was not the main focus of SOLR-4470, so I just quickly did it in 
the way that I found it could be done - without considering performance or 
anything

> HttpClient callback in HttpSolrServer
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-6625
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6625
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SolrJ
>            Reporter: Gregory Chanan
>            Assignee: Gregory Chanan
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-6625.patch, SOLR-6625.patch
>
>
> Some of our setups use Solr in a SPNego/kerberos setup (we've done this by 
> adding our own filters to the web.xml).  We have an issue in that SPNego 
> requires a negotiation step, but some HttpSolrServer requests are not 
> repeatable, notably the PUT/POST requests.  So, what happens is, 
> HttpSolrServer sends the requests, the server responds with a negotiation 
> request, and the request fails because the request is not repeatable.  We've 
> modified our code to send a repeatable request beforehand in these cases.
> It would be nicer if HttpSolrServer provided a pre/post callback when it was 
> making an httpclient request.  This would allow administrators to make 
> changes to the request for authentication purposes, and would allow users to 
> make per-request changes to the httpclient calls (i.e. modify httpclient 
> requestconfig to modify the timeout on a per-request basis).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to