On Dec 28, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Smiley, David W. <dsmi...@mitre.org> wrote: >> Thanks for letting me know about this Rob. I think geonames is much simpler >> (and much less data) to work with than wikipedia. It's plain tab-delimited >> and I like that it includes the population. I'll press forward with my >> benchmark module based patch. I can relatively easily switch between the >> lat-lon type and my geohash type since they both conform to the >> SpatialQueriable interface, and so consequently I don't need two complete >> Lucene checkouts. I had to add Solr & spatial as dependencies to the >> benchmark module but it's worth it to me. >> > > well in my opinion there isn't a reason why benchmark couldn't be > moved to /modules and depend on solr..
+1. I've often thought it as well. Config's could even reference schema/solrconfig.xml to use (longer term) > . others might disagree but i > would prefer that benchmark be a module where you can benchmark > everything. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
