Sure Alan, that sounds good to me. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Alan Woodward <a...@flax.co.uk> wrote:
> I'm working through SOLR-6840 (which I think is what Anshum was referring > to?) at the moment - hopefully I can get this committed today. > > Before the release, I'd really like to resolve SOLR-6976 as well, though. > Leaving deprecated methods in over a major release is asking for trouble > further down the line! > > Alan Woodward > www.flax.co.uk > > > On 14 Jan 2015, at 14:19, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Hi, > > I said yesterday on the corresponding issue that I want to commit > CustomAnalyzer, so I will do this in a minute. > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net] > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:41 AM > *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org > *Subject:* Lucene/Solr 5.0 release branch created > > Hi, > > I've created the Lucene/Solr release branch for version 5.0: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_5_0 > > Please only commit important bug fixes to this branch as we're pretty > close to cutting an RC and a release. I don't think I'd be able to do the > RC as planned on Thursday as we still have a blocker issue in SOLR > (SOLR-6640). We should be able to nail that one and get the first RC out > early next week. > > It's delayed, but it's awesome! :) > > -- > Anshum Gupta > http://about.me/anshumgupta > > > -- Anshum Gupta http://about.me/anshumgupta
