[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980736#action_12980736
 ] 

Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2793:
-----------------------------------------

{quote}
As I said before though, i wouldn't mind if we had something more like a 
'modules/native' and FSDirectory checked, if this was available and 
automagically used it...
but I can't see myself thinking that we should put this logic into fsdir 
itself, sorry. 
{quote}
I'm perfectly OK with that approach (having some module FSDir checks). I also 
feel uneasy having JNI in core.
What I don't want to see, is Directory impls that you can't use on their own. 
If you can only use it for merging, then it's not a Directory, it breaks the 
contract! - move the code elsewhere.

> Directory createOutput and openInput should take an IOContext
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2793
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Store
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2793.patch
>
>
> Today for merging we pass down a larger readBufferSize than for searching 
> because we get better performance.
> I think we should generalize this to a class (IOContext), which would hold 
> the buffer size, but then could hold other flags like DIRECT (bypass OS's 
> buffer cache), SEQUENTIAL, etc.
> Then, we can make the DirectIOLinuxDirectory fully usable because we would 
> only use DIRECT/SEQUENTIAL during merging.
> This will require fixing how IW pools readers, so that a reader opened for 
> merging is not then used for searching, and vice/versa.  Really, it's only 
> all the open file handles that need to be different -- we could in theory 
> share del docs, norms, etc, if that were somehow possible.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to