[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14312504#comment-14312504
 ] 

Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-6227:
----------------------------------

two tangential thoughts/questions...

1) From an API/conceptual standpoint, does it make more sense for this to be a 
new "Occur" instance (the Occur.FILTER here) or would it make more sense for 
this to be a property on BooleanClause that could be set to true with either 
MUST or MUST_NOT clauses?

2) Assuming it's a new Occur.FILTER, should we plan on renaming Occur.MUST_NOT 
to something like Occur.FILTER_NEGATION since (unless i'm missunderstanding 
something) the "non-scoring" semantics of Occur.FILTER and Occur.MUST_NOT are 
basicly the inverse of each other right?  so it seems like we should probably 
do something ot make it more clear that Occur.MUST_NOT has more in common with 
FILTER then with MUST ?

> Add BooleanClause.Occur.FILTER
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-6227
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6227
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Assignee: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Trunk, 5.1
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-6227.patch, LUCENE-6227.patch, LUCENE-6227.patch
>
>
> Now that we have weight-level control of whether scoring is needed or not, we 
> could add a new clause type to BooleanQuery. It would behave like MUST exept 
> that it would not participate in scoring.
> Why do we need it given that we already have FilteredQuery? The idea is that 
> by having a single query that performs conjunctions, we could potentially 
> take better decisions. It's not ready to replace FilteredQuery yet as 
> FilteredQuery has handling of random-access filters that BooleanQuery 
> doesn't, but it's a first step towards that direction and eventually 
> FilteredQuery would just rewrite to a BooleanQuery.
> I've been calling this new clause type FILTER so far, but feel free to 
> propose a better name.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to