[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14327904#comment-14327904
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-6258:
-------------------------------------
bq. Releases take a long time for the release manager to deal with.
Right, that is what I see as the problem. I have real fast internet and it
still takes a long time to shove these files around and sometimes it fails, etc.
We could ditch zip for the entire process and then run a script at the end that
extracts and zips and uploads a zip version. Somehow just do it at the end with
some easy ant target or something.
I don't worry too much about supporting both myself though.
> Cut binary releases down to a single format
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6258
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6258
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ryan Ernst
>
> In LUCENE-6247, one idea discussed to decrease the size of release artifacts
> was removing either tgz or zip from our binary releases.
> The source releases are already only in tgz. I think we should do the same
> for binary releases. I looked at a number of other Apache projects, and the
> results are mixed, but there definitely are many major projects (hadoop,
> couchdb, cassandra, cordova) that only release tgz. Anyone who can deal with
> running using Lucene or Solr should have the skills necessary to extract an
> archive in either format, so in this way I think either format is fine, but I
> think matching what we release source in has a nice look.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
